Rotary Internal-Combustion Engines.

Updated: 15 May 2008
More on Tschudi engine
More on Bradshaw engine
Umpleby engine added
This gallery is in course of arrangement; there have been no updates here for a long time, but things are moving now...
Back to Home PageBack to The Museum

Rotary internal-combustion engine proposals exist in their hundreds, if not their thousands. The similarity with the rotary steam engine in the past is hard to ignore, the difference being of course that in this case a rotary engine achieved some success, in the shape of the Wankel , even if if it took a huge amount of development to get there.
If you have looked at my page on rotary steam engines, you will know that even with steam the problems of sealing and efficiency were severe. Things must surely be an order more difficult in a rotary internal combustion engine, where the pressures and temperatures are much higher.

THE ENGINES
This web page does not even attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the many rotary internal combustion designs that were promoted, as there are simply too many of them. The list here starts from about 1960; there were many proposals before that date, but I currently have none to hand. The dates given here are not necessarily the date on which the proposal was made public, the patent was filed, or anything else precise. It simply means that the project was being actively developed and promoted at that time. Since in most cases I have no information on the current status of most of these projects, I have used the present tense throughout.
What this page does try to do is to provide a starting point for those wishing to further investigate this field. Below, I have tried to classify those engines that are known to me by operating principle. Very possibly I have got some of them wrong. If you think so, or if you know of any good rotary IC engines that should be here, please let me know...

The list below links you to details of the engine, where such details exist on the page. It does not pretend to be a complete list. More engines will be added in time, but probably rather slowly. You know how it is. Of course you do.

Please ignore the #-numbers, this is just a filing system that attempts to keep all this organised.

CLASSIFICATION.

  • The Scissor, pursuing-piston, or cat-and-mouse type
  • Eccentric rotor engines
  • Multirotor engines
    • The Walter Engine:
    • The Scheffel Engine:
    • The Walley Engine:
  • Revolving-block engines
    • The Mercer Cam Engine: 1964 Similiar to the Murray Rotorcam below.
    • The Selwood Engine:
    • The Porsche Engine:
    • The Searle Rotocom Engine: 1981 Sunbury, England: Swash-plate #2
    • The Selwood/Hughes Engine: 1962 England both #2 Hughes 1961 Revolving-block &
    • The Murray Rotorcam: 1991 #1
    • The Anidyne: USA/England
  • Unknown principle of operation.
    • The Harper Engine: W. Virginia, USA: ???
    • The McClure rotary Stirling: p6 #5
  • Not yet classified (#1 UOS)
    • The Brulfert Turbomotor: 1969 France
    • Siddons' S-engine: 1969
    • The Grunstra Engine: 1967
    • The Walker Engine: New Zealand. Date?
    • The Janoil-Sherman Engine: 1964 USA #4
    • The Mayne Split-Cycle Engine: 1993 #6
    • The Craig Swashdrive New Zealand: 1996 #6
    • The Stidworthy Papilio: 1982 England #6
    • The Walker supercharged rotary: New Zealand #6
    • The McCann Rand Cam engine: 1989 USA #6


PURSUING-PISTON ENGINES

THE KAUERTZ ENGINE: 1967.

Left: The Kauertz engine: 1967.

Originator: Eugen Kauertz (German)

This is a fine example of the scissors or pursuing-piston type of rotary engine, which has resurfaced many times. The primary vane or piston rotates at a steady speed, while the secondary vane rotates at a varying speed, opening and closing the spaces between them.

From Popular Science, Jan 1967

Left: The Kauertz engine: 1967.

This shows how the gear and crank mechanism moves one vane with respect to another as the whole assembly rotates. I think the central sun gear is fixed to the casing.

From Popular Science, Jan 1967

One objection to the Kauertz engine is the high inertial loadings on the vanes as they accelerate and decelerate; these are transmitted to rather flimsy-looking linkages. And there seems likely to be sealing issues, as with all rotary engines.


THE VIRMEL ENGINE: 1966

Left: The Virmel engine: 1966.

Originators: Virginia and Melvin Rolfsmeyer (Nebraska, USA)

The Virmel engine is very similiar to the Kauertz, but both sets of vanes stop and start, driven by a sun-and-planet system driving two cranks. Rotary IC engine patents frequently speak of the Kauertz-Virmel type of engine.

Yes, it's a pretty rubbish picture. It is, however, the only one I have been able to find so far.

From Science & Mechanics, Oct 1966

Left: The Virmel engine: 1966.

The internals. On the left are the two piston vanes, pulled apart axially. On the right, the cranks and connecting rods that move the piston vanes; the shape at the top is a hand, giving the scale.

From Science & Mechanics, Oct 1966.

As with the Kauertz engine, there looks to be high inertial loadings on the piston vanes as they accelerate and decelerate; once again these forces are transmitted to flimsy-looking linkages.


THE TSCHUDI ENGINE: 1967

Originator: Traugott Tschudi (Swiss). Work began on the engine in 1927.

Left: The Tschudi engine: 1967.

The Tschudi engine works on the four-stroke cycle. It has four curved-cylindrical pistons moving in a toroidal cylinder; the toroid contains two rotors that each carry a pair of pistons, and two rollers that bear on cams fixed to the output shaft. The pistons stop and start as the rollers either press against the sides of the cam or drop into a groove in it.
I don't pretend to understand how that is supposed to work, or how the pistons are sealed.

From Popular Science, Jan 1967

Left: The operation of the Tschudi engine: 1967.

There are two rollers and a cam in black, and another set in white. The output shaft is eccentric to the rotors and toroids; it turns through 1.2 revolutions for every revolution of the pistons.

From Popular Science, Jan 1967.

An obvious objection is that the stresses on the rollers and cams are going to be high.

Unlike the Kauertz engine, the Tschudi only gives two power impulses for each revolution of the output shaft, and so a practical design requires two toroid assemblies, greatly complicating things.


THE BRADSHAW OMEGA ENGINE: 1955

Left: The Bradshaw Omega engine: 1955.

Originator: Granville Bradshaw (British)

The Bradshaw engine had a single toroidal cylinder, containing four double-ended curved pistons. The pistons reciprocated in pairs, while the cylinder rotated around them, carrying around the spark plug and inlet/exhaust ports. The connection to that spark plug must have involved some complications- a slip-ring, perhaps?

From Popular Science, date unknown.

Left: The Bradshaw engine principle.

The cylinder was rotated by the central shaft while the cranks that reciprocated the pistons were driven by the output shaft, running at half the cylinder speed.

From Popular Science, date unknown.

Left: Granville Bradshaw.

From Popular Science, date unknown.

Granville Bradshaw was no solitary eccentric; he was a respected engine designer who began his career in 1910 and designed the first Pratt & Whitney radial aircraft engine during World War 1. At the time of the Popular Science article he was 67, and described as a "millionaire inventor". He worked extensively on motorbike engines ; see www.realclassic.co.uk (external link) for an interesting motorcycle engine in which the cylinder is cooled by oil rather than air or water.

According to one commentator from the world of motorcycles:

"The Omega was the final fling of a man whose ideas were always clever and innovative, but who sadly failed to understand the commercial needs of the business. His designs were novel, but invariably costly and seldom trouble-free, so his long involvement with the industry made news and kept everyone intrigued, rather than producing machines for riding."

It appears his aeroplane engines were also problematic: see Wikipedia.

I unearthed this quote from Patrick Head, one of the great engineers of Grand Prix racing:

"They had a wonderful project while I was down at Harry Westlake's. Somebody had sent them an engine called a Bradshaw, and it arrived in a cardboard box. It was basically a toroidal chamber with pistons which filled a section of the toroid, attached to two crosses, such that, as they went round, gearing superimposed an oscillation on the rotary motion. Intakes, exhaust and spark plugs were arranged around the periphery of the chamber. I was asked to find out how this engine worked, assemble it and install it on a dynamometer so that it could be evaluated.

"There was no inlet manifold or carburettor, so I got an Amal and made an inlet manifold, assembled the whole contraption and put it on the dyno. It happened that Dan Gurney turned up on the day we were due to start it up, and watched from outside the dyno. room, behind the bullet-proof glass. Anyway, this Bradshaw engine started up - the guy had said that it was perfectly balanced and would rev. to umpteen thousand RPM - the only problem was that in the gear casing, at the back of the engine, he had made all the gears himself, with a file or something! The pitch of the teeth were all irregular and I had to do an incredible amount of lapping - the quality of build was awful.

"Anyway it did start and run, and I fiddled about with the carburettor and sorted out a few things. Dan Gurney was outside and encouraging us to give it the berries. While it was idling at a few hundred RPM a cloud of smoke gradually built up in the dyno. room. Eventually we gave it some more RPM, only about 2,500, when suddenly there was a mighty BANG! and the whole of the glass window disappeared in a mess of oil and metal. Slowly the murk cleared and all we could see through the smoke were the feet of the gearcase, and the toroidal chamber, with bits of cast iron and aluminium all over the place.

"It all got collected up, put back in the box and sent back to Mr Bradshaw. I don't think his concept was properly evaluated at all....."


ECCENTRIC ROTOR ENGINES

THE UMPLEBY ENGINE: 1908

Originator: Umpleby (England)

Left: The Umpleby engine: 1908

The Umpleby engine was an attempt to adapt the Cooley rotary steam engine to four-stroke IC operation. It is the first rotary IC engine I have discovered so far.

Facts are in short supply but Umpleby appears to have made little progess with the engine.

From Norbye


THE SARICH ORBITAL ENGINE: 1972

Originator: Ralph Sarich (Perth, Australia)

This design gathered a lot of publicity in its day; See the Wikipedia page. (external link)

The Sarich Orbital engine had a number of fundamental and unsolved problems kept it from becoming a practical engine. Amongst these are key components that cannot be cooled and others that cannot readily be lubricated; it is very susceptible to overheating. To which we might add the usual sealing problems.

See United States Patent 4,037,997, "Orbital Engine With Stabilizing Plate", published 1977


THE CHAPMAN ORBITAL ENGINE: 1973

Originator: Howard R Chapman (California, USA)

This engine should not strictly be in this gallery of the museum as it was not an IC engine, though it was closely associated with them; it was a "steam engine" powered by Freon. It was intended as part of a bottoming cycle to improve the efficiency of conventional IC engines.

Since it is fundamentally a steam engine, it is to be found in the Rotary Steam Engine gallery, here.

See United States Patent 3,743,451, "Rotary Engine", published 1973


REVOLVING-BLOCK ENGINES

THE MERCER CAM ENGINE.

Left: The Mercer Cam engine: 1964.

Originator: Austin Mercer of Bradford, Yorkshire, UK

In this design, pistons with rollers press against the inside of a cam section, causing the cylinder assembly to rotate by a sort of wedging action.
In the diagram, cylinders 2 and 4 have just fired and cylinders 1 and 3 have reached the end of their power strokes, and are taking in fresh petrol/air via the central rotary valve (a blower is necessary between carburettor and engine to make this happen) as the exhaust exits. It is essentially a two-stroke cycle with each cylinder giving two power strokes per revolution.

The rollers here are working at a massive mechanical disadvantage, trying to squeeze their way round the cam, and I need convincing that this can be done without serious frictional losses. Another point is that the surrounding cam structure needs to be mechanically strong and so will be heavy.

This is the exact IC equivalent of
The Ljungström "Crankless" Steam Engine of 1900.


THE MURRAY ROTORCAM.

Left: The Murray Rotorcam: 1991.

Originator: Jerome Murray, USA

In this design, four cylinders rotate due to the thrust of the roller pressing against the inside of a large elliptical cam track. The variable compression facility offered from 7:1 to 17:1, giving a multi-fuel capability. A 1.3 litre prototype was running on a dynamometer in 1991.

The beak-shaped items may be counterweights to balance the piston forces.

This is another IC equivalent of
The Ljungström "Crankless" Steam Engine of 1900.


THE SIDDONS S-ENGINE.

Left: The Siddons S-engine: 1969

Originator: J R Siddons, Australia

This remarkable proposal has a spherical free piston that is bounced from one end of the S-shaped tube to the other, by means of the other cylindrical "pistons" at each end. The reaction force on the sphere as it traverses each curve of the S-tube causes the engine to rotate around the central axis. But what about the reaction force when the ball starts off?

Frankly, I don't think this is the way forward. (or indeed, around)


SOME PATENTS

A huge number of patents for rotary IC engines have been registered. Here is a random sample.

US 2 927 560
US 2 958 312


CURRENT ROTARY IC ENGINE ACTIVITY.
These are external links; not responsible for the content of external sites. Some of these links are currently dead but are retained here as their titles are the only clue to tracking them down.

The Janova Engine.

The Ball Piston Engine.

The Rand Cam Engine. Dead link

The Antonio Sanchez Hybrid Engine (Spain)

The Dyna-Cam Engine Dead link

The Perlex Engine Dead link

The Veselovsky rotary engine

The Quasiturbine

The Rotary of Koushi Akasaka (Japan)

Back to Home PageBack to The Museum EntranceTop of this page